The Cricketer’s Diplomacy Shame – Aussie Dirty Tournament Part 8

Mr. Peter Rebock said that they are wild dogs. It is true? Global cricket fans not only have to decide but also contribute their views on the future course of action of the International Cricket Control (ICC) and the Cricket Boards of various countries. The so-called supremacy of the Australian Cricketers in the game and their means of winning first place both need review.

I will be debating an issue of Australia and Gori Chamri (white skin) countries that have not only followed the dual standards, but also repeatedly exhibited a biased approach towards Gori Chamri European (GCE) and Black Chamri Asians (BCA) for various matches. . . It is right? Of course, yes to a certain extent. If the readers agree with the opinions of what has been said, I am applauded; or forgive the Aussies for being inharmonious. In fact, I’d say the Aussies have been the worst players since Ponting took over as captain. They follow what I call the Diplomacy of Dirty Cricket Abhorrence (DoDCA).

First of all, first of all, I would like to talk about Muthaia Murlidharan from Sri Lanka, who has been made world famous by Australians as Chucker. It was just the Australian cricketer’s mentally ill stunt for his player to come out on top and rip off the higher grounds. Despite the ICC clearance, the Australian Cricketers were determined to write off Murlidharan. What a dumb way to get first place. I think Australian cricketers, who were afraid to play with Murli’s magic spin, had tried to get him fired as Chucker. What an embarrassing form of fame to win the top position. They have played the same DoDCA again with Harbhajan of India Cricket Team (ICT) and another Pakistani player. So far, all these tricks have given a boost to High Headed Australian Cricketers (HAC), which finally ended on December 26, 2007, when the entire ICT was removed twice for HAC via DoDCA. The HAC has time and again exhibited poor sportsmanship;

A; anti-player conduct both on and off the fields;

Two; unsportsmanlike conduct on the field;

Three; repeatedly exhibited foul body language (DBLG) gestures on the field;

Oven; Trying to influence referees through Nasty Visual Acts (NVA);

Five; repeatedly exhibited foul-mouthed behavior when bowlers are hammered or batsmen are turned over;

Five; telling lies to the umpire, which was clearly evident when Ponting called a ground catch for the Indians in Sydney; Y

Six; the most important is his Headstrong, Arrogant and Selfish behavior.

Secondly, I extend my sincere congratulations to ICT and all the people who condemned the bad sportsmanship of the game (SSG) exhibited by the current group of Cocky Offender Cricketers of Australia nicknamed COCA. What does it matter to a common man if a player performs or not? But it certainly matters to most Indian Cricket Fans (ICF) and World Cricket Fans (WCF) when their favorite players don’t perform. Ponting had not only embarrassed the knight’s game, but also his own conduct and position as a knight’s player. Until now, his DBLG has always exhibited bad facial and hand signals to visiting teams. The filthiest and most reprehensible act of his was when he nearly kicked out Mr. Sharad Powar, chairman of the Board of Control for Cricket of India (BCCI) before a photo shoot.

Third, I would also discuss the role of umpires, their poor decisions and their effect on a Cricket Series. The six wrong decisions in one entry cannot be due to mistakes or default, but are actually planned. I would like to educate WCF regarding:

1) How can a referee give all six wrong decisions against ICT and not even one against Australian players?

2) How is it possible that the referee does not see a ball caught on the ground?

3) Why didn’t ICC cancel the Sydney Test which saw HAC win 16th in a row via Proxy Umpires Deceitful Actions (PUDA)?

4) Why isn’t Ponting being penalized for deliberate lying for a catch on the ground?

Some of my readers have said that the articles are deeply analytical and provide profound statements about subject engagement. I feel that:

A) The ICT team must withdraw from Australia for the good of the game;

B) BCCI must sue Ponting;

C) The Australian Cricket Board should remove Ponting for causing embarrassment to the game;

D) Australians should play Cricket as a gentlemen’s game;

E) Punish all HAC for bad DBLG and NVA.

Finally, I would suggest that India, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Bangladesh and other
African cricket-playing countries should move the ICC headquarters to Asia and eliminate white hegemony forever. When most of the revenue is generated only in Asian countries, why should the ICC be white dominated if there is a sense of apartheid among White Europeans (WSE)?