What’s wrong with the United Nations Agenda 21 program? Sustainability is a good thing, right?

When the United Nations talks about “sustainability”, people listen, governments listen or politicians at all levels listen and say; That sounds like a very good idea. But, I dare to ask; It is? Is it a good idea to have some kind of global government supervisor tell us the best management practices to keep us as efficient as possible, using the latest clean technologies? Suggest things we can do to improve and usher in a new era of global socialism.

Well, they may have fooled the next generation with their educational indoctrination, but they haven’t fooled me. Let’s discuss this as it is a common topic of conversation in our expert group.

A big problem I have with Agenda 21 or Project Venus type concepts with all their perceived efficient strategies is that many master planned communities fall short and turn to rural areas everywhere to supply their “city-state” ( in some cases sanctuary cities) so to speak.

Take New York City (NYC), for example, now it takes almost all the fresh water from the rivers of the upstate, and the power from outside the city, the food of the Midwest, is not what the socialist elite. the left calls “sustainable” not even the majority of its intellectuals. designs, looks good in practice (on paper), but doesn’t perform as well as advertised in the real world; there are always behavioral (crime) problems when too many (human) rats are packed too close together; Okay, the same thing happens with lobsters and rats when their populations become too densely populated.

Without the resources these cities draw from great distances, they become the worst human slums known to mankind. Big cities tax civilization for their needs, rural voters pay for urban bus systems, infrastructure, energy systems, water depletion, and then rural areas deal with urban heat islands by changing patterns. climatic conditions that harm agriculture to feed the masses in urban areas who hate them. It does not work.

Agenda 21 and the entire UN is run by elitists who frankly aren’t that smart or the intellectual technocrats they claim to be, I think there must be a real problem with brain fog due to ambient noise and air pollution, pollution frequency, socialist brainwashing. They have big plans, but they just don’t work, and then they duplicate themselves with more brilliant ideas, almost like the inventor who proclaims “free energy” but can never produce it.

And not to be negative here, but I would like to see a plan that is really feasible, otherwise what we have is the opposite of the Means and Ends Debate on that; If you do everything fairly, but fail to achieve your desired ends, then everything is a waste of time, which is actually worse than violating ethics in the means to achieve your desired ends.

But either way, these concepts floated so far from either the WFS, Technocrats, UN Habitat, DESERATEC TREC, etc. They are pleasant concepts in planning and full of ideas, but without reality control. And don’t get me wrong, Project Venus is “obviously” the smartest way to build a city, and it makes sense, but there is so much more to the needs of a human ant farm. Please think about this.